THE TOPIC IS FOR MSC IN PUBLIC HEALTH,
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW(Methodology section) I Have written the literature review and introduction,
i need help in writing methodology section of systematic review,
GREEN SPACE IMACT ON PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH ON OLDER PEOPLE,
AIMS; TO determine the benefits and value of green space and its impact on physical and mental health
2/ To elucidate how green space contribute to disease and restoration of positive mental and physical impact on older people
OBJECTIVES; by doing systematic review to explore association between green space and physical and mental health in olderpeople
To summarize the report and data to develop how the environment factor play a role on mental and physical health on older people,
systematic review following the PRISMA Model (2009)
DESIGN; PRISMA (PICO)
Participants; people aged over 60 years,in western countries,
Intervention; Green space and physical and mental health on older people
search critera. (PICO)inclusion and Exclusion criteria
KEY Words like greenery, park older people, (refereced them)
for example copy the keyword according to topic referenced them, coz every one copied it,
for data search, use MEDLINE, PUBMED, PSYCHO/INFO, AND CONCHARE(I DONT KNOW THE EXACT just check it.
mention in details the inclusion and exclusion criteria,
TYPES OF studies;
Primary research quantitative, reports, case control observational studies
mstar ,jpi, for quantitative studies, for the outcome,
outcome; Follow Casp, just google it briefly outline the strengths of its use
requirement; the appropriate methods choosen to answer objectives(including strenths and weakness or limitation to choosen methodology to research text,
practical and logistic limitations(critical understanding of strengths and limitation of studies included like review reports, sampling , quantitative primary studies.
NOTABLE POINT; NO DATA AND ANAYLSIS IS INCLUDE AS YOU OBVIOUSLY KNOW IT IS REASRCH PROPOSAL OF METHODOLOGY SECTION,
IN GENERAL TERM, YOU SHOULD attempt to outline research stragery,
justify choice of method,
any potential methodology difficulties, and discuss limitation.
ensure the clarity methods , desigm flow in logically order to objectives and aims.
important point, we are not doing metalanalysis studies only so it goes into weakness,
the primary qualitative studies,are not included,(remember)
do PRISMA PROTOCOL FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REPORTING, PICO CRITERIA,
THE RECOMMENDED PAPER is http;www.york.ac.uk/inst/crdpdf/systematic-review pdf
the prisma statementjust google it oninternet,
ncbi.nlim.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc2707010. can be used as reference for strengths of prisma.
again for outcome casp quality assessment tool is used, just google it briefly explain it,
and put it in appendices the tool guide,
u must follow the Yorkshire guidliness of review, prisma reporting tool, Yorkshire pape which i have given the link tell u about more for outcome measures,
dissemination of the data, heterogenecity, herriachy of the data should be discussed how to overcome by prisma or in methods,
important point for quality assessment of data synthesis which study has been included there is only one viwerer me it goes into weakness, talk about publication bias, data bias i think you know more than me, referenced them it is so important that’s why i am confused and need your help.
i need up to distinction level work, coz my literature review and introduction is upto 75 percent level checked by tutor.
kindly make sure referencing are Harvard APA6 style