After viewing “Debating Same-Sex Marriage” consider at least one of the following:
If principles of justice depend on the moral or intrinsic worth of the ends that rights serve, how should we deal with the fact that people hold different ideas and conceptions of what is good?
Modern liberalism maintains that law should try to be neutral on controversial moral and religious questions. According to this view, the law should not affirm or promote any particular conception of the best way to live, but let citizens choose for themselves how best to live their lives. But is it possible to settle questions of justice and rights without addressing other controversial questions about morality and the common good?
Some believe that a human person comes into being at conception and that abortion is murder. Others argue that certain kinds of abortion should be legal because a woman should have the right to make medical decisions concerning her own body. Is it possible to defend a position on abortion without settling whether abortion is murder? Is it possible to defend a position on abortion without making judgment about the value of women’s control over their own bodies?
Some believe that homosexuality is immoral and that same-sex marriages should not be permitted. Others argue that same-sex marriage should be permitted because everyone has the right to be treated like an equal. Is it possible to defend a position on same-sex marriage without making a judgment about the value of homosexuality? A judgment about the purpose and value of marriage?
Place your order now for a similar paper and have exceptional work written by our team of experts to guarantee you A Results
Why Choose US
6+ years experience on custom writing
80% Return Client
Urgent 2 Hrs Delivery
Your Privacy Guaranteed
Unlimited Free Revisions
The question first appeared on Write My Essay