Socrates-Meno Academic Essay

Meno, first half
S. asserts, and Meno agrees, that we don’t know anything about an F if we don’t know at all what F is. [This
seems to be less than obvious, but more plausible if we emphasize know. This feature reappears in the puzzle.]
S. thinks of knowledge as essential to morality. It certainly seems necessary to morality, but S. thinks it
sufficient as well. In the Protagoras, the argument that knowing A is a better action than B, that is having the
measuring craft, makes it the case that we will do A.]
But in the first part of Meno the emphasis is on explanation, so the knowledge required seems to be theoretical
– an account of what F is. We might think the knowledge required is essentially practical and might not require
knowledge of the nature of the moral properties. This question is treated in the second half. S. needs to show
that these two types of knowledge are connected.
The earlier dialogues (including Euthyphro and Protagoras) what an account would be is taken for granted, but
Meno requires more. The discussion brings out that an account must be in terms a) not in dispute and b)
already understood by the questioner.
That this is not yet enough is indicated by the fact that none of three accounts that S. offers as an example –
two for shape, one for color – are adequate. But it is progress.
Meno believes there are accounts of the essential nature of many F’s, but he has doubts that there are accounts
in the case of the moral properties. The virtues in his view are essentially heterogeneous – they can only be
given by list. Nothing in the nature of language or concepts requires that there be, for each meaningful word,
an essential nature (Wittgenstein’s example was game). But Meno believes that he, like Gorgias, can give
‘confident answers’ on significant matter. But how can he be confident that a chat eristic should be on the list
of virtues without a criterion? (It is a kind of pragmatic inconsistency: he could just give up being so confident,
but he would rather not. We could think of the same problem arising for a city – which are to be the civic
virtues, what is to be the civic list, why be confident we could not do better?)
But accounts seem to resist discovery. Why? Meno proposes this, without complete sincerity:
1. Unless we know what F is, we cannot say anything about F.
2. If we cannot say anything about F, then we cannot distinguish F from other unknowns.
3. If we cannot distinguish instances of F, we cannot inquire about the nature of F.
4. Knowing what F is requires a Socratic account, and we don not have such accounts.
So, we cannot inquire about F. (That’s why Meno can’t find an answer.)
This is too much of a paradox, relying on the appearance of know at each place. But it would be enough to
begin inquire if I believe these are F’s and in fact they are. That is, to begin true belief is necessary, not
knowledge.
What remains a problem is how at the beginning we can take any of our beliefs to be true. This is the point of
the recollection argument.
If the argument works as S. thinks, then the slave had true beliefs that he was able to summon up under
questioning. These were not taught to him. S. does not claim that this particular instance rises to the level of
knowledge, but rather that if the slave kept at this sort of thing his knowledge would be as good as anyone’s.
The solution to the puzzle, then, is that we can inquire with confidence because we have already some true
beliefs, and these may come out if we ask the right questions. That solution, so stated, does not mention
recollection. Recollection is supposed to explain the further question, how is it possible to already have true
beliefs.
[S. makes three claims: 1) we have already true beliefs; 2) true beliefs come from recollection; and 3) we should
then be confident we can inquire. He then says he will stand firmly behind 3) but may have doubts about the
other two. But how could he hold 3) without 1)? So if he has doubts it is about recollection itself.] We see
recollection again in the Phaedo.
[In the first half, S. is at pains to distinguish having recollected from having been taught. In the second half,
however, he includes recollection as a way of being taught. This makes a difference in the second argument in
the second half.]
For further reference: a feature of the refutation of the third argument “to desire find things and have the power
to get them”.
Beginning at 77b where the definition is first stated
– each occurrence of the word ‘desire’ down to 78 translates the noun form of the Greek verb epithumein
– after ‘those that are miserable are unhappy?’ there is a switch. We have, in order ‘wish’, ‘want’, ‘desire’, ‘want’,
and ‘desire’. The middle ‘desire’ is epithumein, but the rest are boulesthai, accurately translated as wish. So
when he concludes “were you not just saying that virtue is to desire good things and have the power to get
them,’ that occurrence of the English desire is actually boulesthai, wish. So it is not exactly what he was saying if
desire and wish mean something different. Does it make a difference? (Apparently not to our translator.)
Meno does not note this, but it is very odd. If desire and wish are to be interchangeable, then we would expect
them to occur randomly. But what actually happens is the ‘desire’ is used in the first statement and then used
consistently down to the central – that no one wishes to be worse off. Thereafter, the term is wish. What could
this mean?
If it has any point, it would have to be the suggestion that while no one could wish to be miserable, it might
somehow be the case that someone could desire to be miserable. Meno says nothing, Socrates says nothing,
but Plato may be saying something.

find the cost of your paper

you will demonstrate your grasp of these concepts in a 500word essay/oral presentation on one of the films we’ve viewed and critically analyzed this quarter. Specifically, you will 1. Identify a key issue examined by a film of your choice. Express the issue as a question; briefly explain its context; word it carefully and precisely. (5 points). 2. Research your issue: (a) Select three credible divergent sources on the issue and clearly explain the position each takes. (b) Use your textbook for additional supporting evidence. (c) Evaluate the quality of evidence each brings to bear on its argument. Document your sources accurately. (d) Identify implicit components of the argument in each article that may affect the reasoning, as appropriate. (10 points) 3. Synthesize the strongest points of these divergent arguments with your own personal perspective to arrive at your “informed opinion” or conclusion. Explain your thinking and lay out the evidence in support of your conclusion clearly: is it reliable? Relevant? Balanced? Sufficient? Your goal is to convince your audience that your conclusion is superior to others and is worth accepting. (10 points) Academic Essay

CustomEssaysWriters | you will demonstrate your grasp of these concepts in a 500word essay/oral presentation on one of the films we’ve viewed and critically analyzed this quarter. Specifically, you will 1. Identify a key issue examined by a film of your choice. Express the issue as a question; briefly explain its context; word it carefully and precisely. (5 points). 2. Research your issue: (a) Select three credible divergent sources on the issue and clearly explain the position each takes. (b) Use your textbook for additional supporting evidence. (c) Evaluate the quality of evidence each brings to bear on its argument. Document your sources accurately. (d) Identify implicit components of the argument in each article that may affect the reasoning, as appropriate. (10 points) 3. Synthesize the strongest points of these divergent arguments with your own personal perspective to arrive at your “informed opinion” or conclusion. Explain your thinking and lay out the evidence in support of your conclusion clearly: is it reliable? Relevant? Balanced? Sufficient? Your goal is to convince your audience that your conclusion is superior to others and is worth accepting. (10 points) – CustomEssaysWriters

English Composition Academic Essay

Choose an international challenge facing the United States or any policy challenge facing a country other than the United States. Write a briefing paper that you would give to a public policy official organized using the 5 headings described below. Please identify the beginning of each section in your paper. The paper must be at least 3 pages but no more than 4 pages in length. The only topic choices that are not permitted are the Resource Curse and Climate Change/Global Warming.
1. Importance (15 points)
a. Describe why it’s an important public policy challenge
2. Background (15 points)
a. Provide historical background to the challenge
b. Identify what has been done to try to address it
3. Underlying Causes (15 points)
a. Identify what is causing this problem to persist
4. Policy Options (15 points)
a. Describe potential ways to solve the policy challenge
5. Solution (20 points)
a. Choose a solution you would recommend
b. Explain why this solution is better than other alternatives supported by quality data and information
Remaining Points Available:
• Use of data and information – 10 Points
• 3 or more different quality sources – 10 Points (Note: Points will be deducted if you use Wikipedia or my lecture slides as a source – find the original source of the information)
Formatting:
• 1 inch margins on all sides
• 11 point font
• Double spaced
• Source material using endnotes or in-text citations with a works cited page
Policies on Plagiarism:
A definition of plagiarism, along with definitions of other forms of academic misconduct, is found in the Indiana University Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities, and Conduct. Any student who cheats or plagiarizes on any written assignment will be given a failing grade in the course in addition to any other sanctions imposed by the School or the University.

find the cost of your paper

Demonstrate how to use patient classification systems to calculate nursing care hours Academic Essay

Please answer each question, separately
Us 200 word count for each question.
Use 2 references ( Each chapter counts for a reference so Please include another reference for each question.)
Reference: Sullivan, E. J. (2013). Effective Leadership and Management in Nursing (8 ed.). Pearson Education.

1. Describe how effective delegation benefits the delegator, the delegate, the unit, and the organization. Chapter 10

2. Distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate questions to ask during an interview
Chapter 15.

3. Demonstrate how to use patient classification systems to calculate nursing care hours
necessary. Chaper 16

4. Describe how motivation and ability affect job performance.
Chapter 17

5. Discuss why succession planning is essential to the future.
Chapter 17

6. Describe criteria that can be used toevaluate staff performance.
Chaper 18

 

For a custom paper on the above topic, place your order now!

What We Offer:

• On-time delivery guarantee

• PhD-level writers

• Automatic plagiarism check

• 100% money-back guarantee

• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality

• High Quality custom-written papers

find the cost of your paper

Annual report Academic Essay

The company is Apple, Inc. Read and complete Chapter 3 from eText, “Getting Under the Hood of an Annual Report, 2013,
Dbitter and Associates, Bittar, Donald.” 1. Complete the four (3) tables included in the Chapter (i.e., tables 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3);
2. Include the completed tables into a Word document. I am also attaching here copy of the rubric that will be used to grade
this work. The rubric covers all that u need, and has good information to guide you in providing the necessary (and required)
responses to the questions from the tables. Any further questions, please let me know.

find the cost of your paper

GNC Fish oil Academic Essay

We Guarantee!

image

  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

We Keep Our Word!

image

We know how costly lateness can get!

Our Services

  • Dissertation Writing
  • Term Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Coursework Writing

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 275 words per page

Browse Posts By Category

WalMart in China Academic Essay

MEMORANDUM
TO: (The Instructor)
FROM: (The student)
DATE: (Due Date)
RE: (Case Name)
Paragraph 1 – Brief Overview, background of the company and industry. Be sure to identify where it is in the organizational
life cycle.
Paragraph 2 – Overview of internal analysis (should be the same as opening paragraph of internal section. Start with the
IFEM score and interpretation. Include all major factors and any minor ones of particular significance)
Paragraph 3 – Overview of external analysis (should be the same as opening paragraph of external section. Start with the
EFEM score and interpretation. Include all major factors and any minor ones of particular significance)
Paragraph 4 – Recommended vision and strategy (start with the I&E plot point and interpret it, then identity the potential
strategies available and recommend one)
Paragraph 5 – Conclusions
• NOTE:
o Cover memo should be written last. It is from the student to the instructor, and includes the date and the name of the case.
It should not exceed two pages and the desired length is one page
The following is a guideline for the writing up your case analysis. It gives guidance and examples of what should be
contained in the specific sections. Remember – this is a guideline and not the actual content for each case. You need to
think critically and identify appropriate content for each section.
Additionally – this is a guide, there may be times when the categories identified in the Internal and External analysis are not
evident in the case. Use your judgment and include those items that are.
Introduction and Overview
Introduction and overview of the company; need to give some history and background information, where the organization
is in the organization life cycle – identify and support.
This section should be devoted to giving context to the case and the organization. Who are key employees; how many
does the company/organization have; what kind of business is it in; how long has it been in the business; where is it in the
organization life cycle (OLC) and what characteristics support that notion; etc. You need to use critical thinking and analysis
when considering the OLC – think about the connection of the BCG matrix to the OLC in supporting your position.
Mission, Goals and Current Strategies
Current mission, goals and strategies – this should discuss what the mission is based on the case, what the current
strategies are – if they have not been clearly articulated

find the cost of your paper

WalMart in China Academic Essay

MEMORANDUM
TO: (The Instructor)
FROM: (The student)
DATE: (Due Date)
RE: (Case Name)
Paragraph 1 – Brief Overview, background of the company and industry. Be sure to identify where it is in the organizational
life cycle.
Paragraph 2 – Overview of internal analysis (should be the same as opening paragraph of internal section. Start with the
IFEM score and interpretation. Include all major factors and any minor ones of particular significance)
Paragraph 3 – Overview of external analysis (should be the same as opening paragraph of external section. Start with the
EFEM score and interpretation. Include all major factors and any minor ones of particular significance)
Paragraph 4 – Recommended vision and strategy (start with the I&E plot point and interpret it, then identity the potential
strategies available and recommend one)
Paragraph 5 – Conclusions
• NOTE:
o Cover memo should be written last. It is from the student to the instructor, and includes the date and the name of the case.
It should not exceed two pages and the desired length is one page
The following is a guideline for the writing up your case analysis. It gives guidance and examples of what should be
contained in the specific sections. Remember – this is a guideline and not the actual content for each case. You need to
think critically and identify appropriate content for each section.
Additionally – this is a guide, there may be times when the categories identified in the Internal and External analysis are not
evident in the case. Use your judgment and include those items that are.
Introduction and Overview
Introduction and overview of the company; need to give some history and background information, where the organization
is in the organization life cycle – identify and support.
This section should be devoted to giving context to the case and the organization. Who are key employees; how many
does the company/organization have; what kind of business is it in; how long has it been in the business; where is it in the
organization life cycle (OLC) and what characteristics support that notion; etc. You need to use critical thinking and analysis
when considering the OLC – think about the connection of the BCG matrix to the OLC in supporting your position.
Mission, Goals and Current Strategies
Current mission, goals and strategies – this should discuss what the mission is based on the case, what the current
strategies are – if they have not been clearly articulated

find the cost of your paper